Logo-ps
Pharm Sci. 2019;25(3): 177-183.
doi: 10.15171/PS.2019.48

Scopus ID: 85072812313
  Abstract View: 1526
  PDF Download: 1201

Review

Use of Lidocaine for Pain Management in the Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Morteza Ghojazadeh 1 ORCID logo, Sarvin Sanaie 2 ORCID logo, Zahra Parsian 3 ORCID logo, Roya Najafizadeh 4 ORCID logo, Hassan Soleimanpour 5* ORCID logo

1 Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine (RCEBM), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Emergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: h.soleimanpour@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Lidocaine is a well-known medium-acting local anesthetic with a short onset time. It is a valuable drug for managing both acute and chronic pains and is being used as a popular agent for pain control in the emergency department (ED). In this systematic review, we intended to define the effectiveness of lidocaine in pain management of the patients referring to ED. Methods: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was utilized for this Systematic Review (SR). We searched the databases of PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Medline (Ovid) from 1990 to August 2017 for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in which the study population was referred to the emergency department and received lidocaine. Full-texts of the studies that were published in English were reviewed for inclusion. Both authors individualistically evaluated all studies. Seven articles were eligible for the meta-analysis based on their common outcomes. Results: The total number of subjects was 671. The studies were categorized based on the type of drug and administration route. Mean pain, regardless of the drug administration method, in the placebo group was 0.69 units higher than the lidocaine group. Considering the administration route, mean pain in the placebo group was 0.35 units higher than the lidocaine group when administered topically, and it was lower in the subcutaneous method than the topical method by 1.41 units. Conclusion: Infiltration of lidocaine decreases pain of different procedures in the ED whereas the effect of topical lidocaine is controversial issue.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1526

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 1201

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 14 Apr 2019
Revision: 31 May 2019
Accepted: 29 Jun 2019
ePublished: 30 Sep 2019
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)