Logo-ps
Submitted: 13 Mar 2024
Revision: 24 Aug 2024
Accepted: 07 Sep 2024
ePublished: 13 Feb 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Pharm Sci. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/PS.024.40299
  Abstract View: 20

Review Article

Evaluation of the Effects of Baricitinib and Ruxolitinib in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients: A Meta-Analysis Study

Mehdi Nurmohammad Ahari 1* ORCID logo, Ata Mahmoodpoor 2, Hassan Soleimanpour 3, Hamed Valizadeh 4, Shadi Ziaie 1, Hadi Hamishekar 5

1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
3 Medical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
4 Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
5 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Email: mehdi.pharmacist@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe lung disease with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Baricitinib and Ruxolitinib, known as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have shown promise in mitigating the inflammatory response associated with ARDS. This study aims to systematically compare the effects of baricitinib and ruxolitinib in ARDS patients by pooling data from relevant clinical trials and observational studies.

Methods: After searching international databases, including Web of Science (WoS), Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar with MeSH phrases and keywords, 9 studies were obtained for further analysis. The statistical analysis of the data was conducted by using a random-effects model. The I2 index and the chi-squared test were employed to compute heterogeneity. Egger’s tests and Begg’s funnel plots were employed to assess publication bias.

Results: A total of 484 ARDS patients were examined from nine articles. The pooled ages of ARDS patients who received baricitinib and ruxolitinib were 63.25 years (61.42-65.08) and 63.12 years (59.53-66.72), respectively. In comparison to standard treatment or a placebo, the pooled data showed a significant decrease in mortality rates among ARDS patients treated with baricitinib and ruxolitinib.; the rate of mortality at 28-days in ARDS patients who received baricitinib and ruxolitinib was 11% (95% CI: 3%-19%), and 37% (95% CI: 31%-43%), respectively. Also, findings revealed that the average duration of invasive ventilation in ARDS patients who received ruxolitinib was 14 days (95% CI: 3%-25%). Our analysis revealed no significant publication bias (p-value>0.05).

Conclusion: In conclusion, baricitinib and ruxolitinib have shown promising efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety profiles in ARDS patients.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 21

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.